DisplayPort vs HDMI: Which one should you use?

Affiliate links on Android Authority may earn us a commission. Learn more.

If you’re hooking up a PC to a monitor — or a TV, in some cases — you may be faced with the option of using either DisplayPort or HDMI, both of which are valid video outputs. Here’s a primer on the two technologies, and when to reach for one cable or the other.

JUMP TO KEY SECTIONS

Assuming you have access to the latest versions of both technologies, the only time you should use HDMI is if DisplayPort isn’t an option. That tends to mean connecting to TVs, since relatively few of them offer DisplayPort. Indeed HDMI is an industry standard not just for TVs but many of their associated peripherals, such as receivers and ARC/eARC-compatible speakers.

In reality, of course, there can easily be a mismatch between the best DisplayPort chain available versus HDMI. If your video card, cable, and display all support HDMI 2.1, but something in your DisplayPort chain is limited to 1.2, you’ll get 24-bit color and VRR support by choosing HDMI. HDMI 2.1 tends to beat DisplayPort 1.4 as well, with one gap we’ll cover below.

You’ll primarily be using DisplayPort with monitors, since as we noted, most TVs lack a compatible connection. Even when there is DisplayPort on a TV, it’s unlikely to be up to the 2.1 spec, which was only made available in October 2022. The most common version of DisplayPort is 1.4, whereas HDMI 2.1 is already fairly widespread.

DisplayPort always tends to have the advantage in smooth gaming, since even 1.3 connections run 1080p at 360 Hz and 4K at 98Hz. That easily trumps HDMI 2.0, which delivers 240 and 60Hz refresh rates, respectively. DisplayPort 2.1 hits 4K at 240Hz and 8K at 85Hz, surpassing HDMI 2.1’s 144 and 30Hz. Mind that 8K monitors are rare and expensive like 8K TVs, if not moreso.

If refresh rates are sufficient, it’s always best to use a connection with VRR support (starting with DisplayPort 1.2a or HDMI 2.1) if you want to maximize performance while eliminating “tearing” artifacts. On top of your display, cable, and video card, though, software may also need VRR support.

Technically speaking, DisplayPort 2.1 is superior to its counterpart. As long you’re using at least DisplayPort 1.4 or HDMI 2.0 however, you’ll probably have a fantastic experience. Yes, HDMI 2.0 users won’t get VRR, or 4K framerates over 60fps, but that’s still smooth. And while only DisplayPort 2.1 can handle 8K framerates over 30fps, that particular issue is all but irrelevant, since only the most expensive consumer video cards can handle 8K gaming at decent speeds.

If you can buy an appropriate converter, yes. You’ll need to spend on a quality active HDMI-to-DisplayPort converter to preserve output, though, whereas even a passive DisplayPort-to-HDMI converter will hold up.

Yes, as long as your video card has the right ports and enough performance to handle multiple displays at the resolutions you set. Modern (dedicated) cards can easily do two 1080p displays simultaneously, but can potentially run into trouble with two or more 4K outputs.

The simple answer is yes, as long as everything in your output chain can handle 144Hz. You’ll be limited to 1080p resolution unless your chain is equipped for DisplayPort 2.x and HDMI 2.1.

Only DisplayPort 1.4 or earlier, and with 1.4 it’s unlikely to make much practical difference.